Has The Us Supreme Court Turned A Corner?

Discussion in 'News, Current Events, and Politics' started by LastOutlaw, Nov 26, 2020.

0/5, 0 votes

  1. LastOutlaw

    LastOutlaw Legendary Survivalist
      510/575

    Blog Posts:
    0
    https://www.breitbart.com/faith/202...ious-groups-against-andrew-cuomo-5-4-barrett/

    Supreme Court Sides with Religious Groups Against Andrew Cuomo, 5-4
    1,076
    724a984b5924accb3b30f40b9adefc47.jpeg
    Olivier Douliery/AFP/Getty Images
    Joel B. Pollak25 Nov 2020213
    4:16


    The U.S. Supreme Court granted an injunction Wednesday evening against New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s restrictions on religious services in a 5-4 decision that saw Justice Amy Coney Barrett with the conservative majority — and Chief Justice John Roberts siding with the liberal minority.

    The Court was responding to a request for an emergency injunction by the Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn and the Agudath Israel of America, an Orthodox Jewish group, against restrictions limiting services to ten people in some areas and 25 people in others.

    In early October, Cuomo openly threatened to “close the synagogues” if they did not comply with his orders.

    The decision read, in part:

    Citing a variety of remarks made by the Governor, Agudath Israel argues that the Governor specifically targeted the Orthodox Jewish community and gerrymandered the boundaries of red and orange zones to ensure that heavily Orthodox areas were included. Both the Diocese and Agudath Israel maintain that the regulations treat houses of worship much more harshly than comparable secular facilities. And they tell us without contradiction that they have complied with all public health guidance, have implemented additional precautionary measures, and have operated at 25% or 33% capacity for months without a single outbreak.

    The applicants have clearly established their entitlement to relief pending appellate review. They have shown that their First Amendment claims are likely to prevail, that denying them relief would lead to irreparable injury, and that granting relief would not harm the public interest.



    In a red zone, while a synagogue or church may not admit more than 10 persons, businesses categorized as “essential” may admit as many people as they wish. And the list of “essential” businesses includes things such as acupuncture facilities, camp grounds, garages, as well as many whose services are not limited to those that can be regarded as essential, such as all plants manufacturing chemicals and microelectronics and all transportation facilities.



    Stemming the spread of COVID–19 is unquestionably a compelling interest, but it is hard to see how the challenged regulations can be regarded as “narrowly tailored.” They are far more restrictive than any COVID–related regulations that have previously come be- fore the Court,2 much tighter than those adopted by many other jurisdictions hard-hit by the pandemic, and far more severe than has been shown to be required to prevent the spread of the virus at the applicants’ services.



    Members of this Court are not public health experts, and we should respect the judgment of those with special expertise and responsibility in this area. But even in a pandemic, the Constitution cannot be put away and forgotten.

    Justice Neil Gorsuch issued a concurring opinion, as did Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

    Roberts wrote a dissenting opinion in which he noted that the governor had changed the restrictions the day after the lawsuit was filed. Justice Kavanaugh, however, pointed out that the underlying executive order was still in effect, meaning the governor needed to be constrained from changing the regulations again pending the outcome of the lawsuit.

    Justices Stephen Breyer, Elena Kagan, and Sonia Sotomayor joined in a dissent that cited the severity of the coronavirus pandemic and the Court’s traditional deference to local officials on matters involving scientific expertise.

    Kagan and Sotomayor also issued a separate dissent.

    Gov. Cuomo received an international Emmy award this week, as Hollywood celebrated his leadership in the coronavirus pandemic.

    Joel B. Pollak is Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News and the host of Breitbart News Sunday on Sirius XM Patriot on Sunday evenings from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. ET (4 p.m. to 7 p.m. PT). His newest e-book is The Trumpian Virtues: The Lessons and Legacy of Donald Trump’s Presidency. His recent book, RED NOVEMBER, tells the story of the 2020 Democratic presidential primary from a conservative perspective. He is a winner of the 2018 Robert Novak Journalism Alumni Fellowship. Follow him on Twitter at @joelpollak.
     
    TMT Tactical and randyt like this.
  2. LastOutlaw

    LastOutlaw Legendary Survivalist
      510/575

    Blog Posts:
    0
    "But even in a pandemic, the Constitution cannot be put away and forgotten."

    Lets hope this line of thinking continues.

    Note: Once again...how did Roberts vote?

    Do you think the Supreme Court realizes that they will also be out of a job if socialism/communism/NWO takes over?
     
    TMT Tactical likes this.
  3. wally

    wally Master Survivalist
      280/345

    Blog Posts:
    0
    somehow we need to fire roberts...
     
    TMT Tactical and LastOutlaw like this.
  4. randyt

    randyt Master Survivalist
      415/460

    Blog Posts:
    0
    turned a corner until the court gets packed with liberals.
     
    wally and TMT Tactical like this.
  5. TexDanm

    TexDanm Shadow Dancer
      525/575

    Blog Posts:
    2
    The American Supreme Court is like everything else in American Politics and wishy-washy. As the liberals try to pack it with liberal judges and then the conservatives do the same. the one thing that they don't care about in either way is doing what is right constitutionally or what is good or right for America as a whole. Right now the Trump replacements have given the Conservivits a one-vote lead. Wait until you see what President Harris installs in the Courts.
     
    TMT Tactical likes this.
  6. randyt

    randyt Master Survivalist
      415/460

    Blog Posts:
    0
    hopefully we retain the senate and after the goat rope harris and biden are going to unleash maybe things will come around, maybe not too.
     
    TMT Tactical and wally like this.
Loading...
Similar Threads Forum Date
Sneaking Around The Supreme Court.... News, Current Events, and Politics Jul 10, 2022
U.s. Supreme Court Targeted For Invasion News, Current Events, and Politics Apr 14, 2021
Are These Articles Deceptive? The Wall Supreme Court Ruling News, Current Events, and Politics Jul 27, 2019
The Supremes Justice Alito Discusses Lockdowns And Rights News, Current Events, and Politics Nov 16, 2020
Chief Of Supremes Fell; Accident ? News, Current Events, and Politics Jul 8, 2020
Important Decision By Supremes News, Current Events, and Politics Jun 30, 2020
The Supremes Side With Trump, Against Aclu News, Current Events, and Politics Jun 26, 2020
To The Supremes ! Do They Look Happy ? The Hangout Jan 15, 2020
Supremes Refuse Boise, Idaho Homeless Case News, Current Events, and Politics Dec 16, 2019
Biden On Packing The Court News, Current Events, and Politics Oct 18, 2020

Share This Page